Tag Archives: malware

Regin??????????????????

      No Comments on Regin??????????????????
Regin 是一款先進的窺伺工具,本身具有極為罕見的技術專業能力,並且已經運用於窺伺政府機關、基礎設施營運商、各級企業、研究機構乃至於平民個人。

Twitter Card Style: 

summary

Code_tunnel_concept.png

 

這款先進的惡意軟體,名稱為 Regin;至少自 2008 年起就已經開始用運用在有系統的窺伺活動中,針對許多跨國目標進行窺伺。Regin 屬於後門類型的木馬程式,是一款複雜的惡意軟體,其結構呈現出罕見的技術專業能力。這款惡意軟體藉由依目標而定的眾多功能實現自訂目標,能夠使其操控者得以運用功能強大的架構進行大規模監視,並且已經運用在以政府機關、基礎設施營運商、各級企業、研究機構乃至於平民個人為對象的窺伺行動當中。

這款惡意軟體的開發時間,就算不是耗時數年,也是耗費數個月才完成的;而且作者也花費許多心思隱匿其蹤跡。Regin 的功能及其背後所投注的資源層級,在在顯示,這是一款國家級的重大網路刺探工具。

正如賽門鐵克在新發行的技術白皮書中所言Backdoor.Regin 是一項分段式威脅,而且除第一階段外,各個階段都經過隱藏並以加密處理。執行第一階段會啟動一連串的解密作業,並載入所有後續階段,一共五個階段。而各別階段皆提供少量有關完整套件的資訊。只有集合全部五個階段,才能分析並瞭解這項威脅。

fig1-architecture.png

1.Regin 的五個階段

Regin 也採用模組化方式,載入專為特定目標而設計的自訂功能。這種模組化方式也已經在其他系列的精密惡意軟體系列中發現,例如 Flamer 與 Weevil (即「面具」),而分段式載入架構,也類似於 Duqu/Stuxnet 系列威脅所呈現的情況。  

時間進程與目標相關資料
在 2008 年至 2011 年之間,我們觀察到 Regin 感染各種組織機構,而在此之後,它卻突然隱匿。而此惡意軟體的新版本,則是自 2013 年起重新出現。攻擊目標包含民營公司、政府機關以及研究機構。將近半數的感染,都是以平民個人與小型企業做為目標。針對電信公司的攻擊,顯然意在取得透過其基礎設施傳送的通話內容。

fig2-sectors.png

2.經各部門所確認的 Regin 感染事件

感染事件發生在各個不同的地區,已經獲悉的感染,主要發生於十個不同的國家地區。

fig3-countries.png

2.經各部門所確認的 Regin 感染事件

感染事件發生在各個不同的地區,已經獲悉的感染,主要發生於十個不同的國家地區。

Regin: Top-tier espionage tool enables stealthy surveillance

An advanced spying tool, Regin displays a degree of technical competence rarely seen and has been used in spying operations against governments, infrastructure operators, businesses, researchers, and private individuals.

Twitter Card Style: 

summary

Code_tunnel_concept.png

 

An advanced piece of malware, known as Regin, has been used in systematic spying campaigns against a range of international targets since at least 2008. A back door-type Trojan, Regin is a complex piece of malware whose structure displays a degree of technical competence rarely seen. Customizable with an extensive range of capabilities depending on the target, it provides its controllers with a powerful framework for mass surveillance and has been used in spying operations against government organizations, infrastructure operators, businesses, researchers, and private individuals.

It is likely that its development took months, if not years, to complete and its authors have gone to great lengths to cover its tracks. Its capabilities and the level of resources behind Regin indicate that it is one of the main cyberespionage tools used by a nation state.

As outlined in a new technical whitepaper from Symantec, Backdoor.Regin is a multi-staged threat and each stage is hidden and encrypted, with the exception of the first stage.  Executing the first stage starts a domino chain of decryption and loading of each subsequent stage for a total of five stages.  Each individual stage provides little information on the complete package. Only by acquiring all five stages is it possible to analyze and understand the threat.

fig1-architecture.png

Figure 1. Regin’s five stages

 

Regin also uses a modular approach, allowing it to load custom features tailored to the target. This modular approach has been seen in other sophisticated malware families such as Flamer and Weevil (The Mask), while the multi-stage loading architecture is similar to that seen in the Duqu/Stuxnet family of threats.  

Timeline and target profile

Regin infections have been observed in a variety of organizations between 2008 and 2011, after which  it was abruptly withdrawn. A new version of the malware resurfaced from 2013 onwards. Targets include private companies, government entities and research institutes. Almost half of all infections  targeted private individuals and small businesses. Attacks on telecoms companies appear to be designed to gain access to calls being routed through their infrastructure.

fig2-sectors.png

Figure 2. Confirmed Regin infections by sector

 

Infections are also geographically diverse, having been identified in mainly in ten different countries.

fig3-countries.png

Figure 3. Confirmed Regin Infections by Country

 

Infection vector and payloads

The infection vector varies among targets and no reproducible vector had been found at the time of writing. Symantec believes that some targets may be tricked into visiting spoofed versions of well-known websites and the threat may be installed through a Web browser or by exploiting an application. On one computer, log files showed that Regin originated from Yahoo! Instant Messenger through an unconfirmed exploit.

Regin uses a modular approach, giving flexibility to the threat operators as they can load custom features tailored to individual targets when required. Some custom payloads are very advanced and exhibit a high degree of expertise in specialist sectors, further evidence of the level of resources available to Regin’s authors.

There are dozens of Regin payloads. The threat’s standard capabilities include several Remote Access Trojan (RAT) features, such as capturing screenshots, taking control of the mouse’s point-and-click functions, stealing passwords, monitoring network traffic, and recovering deleted files. 

More specific and advanced payload modules were also discovered, such as a Microsoft IIS web server traffic monitor and a traffic sniffer of the administration of mobile telephone base station controllers.

Stealth

Regin’s developers put considerable effort into making it highly inconspicuous. Its low key nature means it can potentially be used in espionage campaigns lasting several years. Even when its presence is detected, it is very difficult to ascertain what it is doing. Symantec was only able to analyze the payloads after it decrypted sample files.

It has several “stealth” features. These include anti-forensics capabilities, a custom-built encrypted virtual file system (EVFS), and alternative encryption in the form of a variant of RC5, which isn’t commonly used. Regin uses multiple sophisticated means to covertly communicate with the attacker including via ICMP/ping, embedding commands in HTTP cookies, and custom TCP and UDP protocols.

Conclusions

Regin is a highly-complex threat which has been used in systematic data collection or intelligence gathering campaigns. The development and operation of this malware would have required a significant investment of time and resources, indicating that a nation state is responsible. Its design makes it highly suited for persistent, long term surveillance operations against targets.

The discovery of Regin highlights how significant investments continue to be made into the development of tools for use in intelligence gathering. Symantec believes that many components of Regin remain undiscovered and additional functionality and versions may exist.  Additional analysis continues and Symantec will post any updates on future discoveries

Further reading

Indicators of compromise for security administrators and more detailed and technical information can be found in our technical paper – Regin: Top-tier espionage tool enables stealthy surveillance

Protection Information

Symantec detects this threat as Backdoor.Regin.

Regin: Una herramienta de ciberespionaje que permite vigilar sigilosamente

Esta avanzada herramienta de espionaje muestra un grado de competencias técnicas que no se ven con frecuencia y ha sido usada en operaciones de espionaje con foco en gobiernos, operadores de infraestructura, negocios, investigadores e individuos específic

Twitter Card Style: 

summary

Code_tunnel_concept.png

Una malware avanzado conocido como Regin, se ha utilizado en campañas de espionaje sistemático contra una serie de objetivos internacionales desde al menos 2008. Regin es una pieza compleja de software malicioso del tipo backdoor cuya estructura muestra un grado de competencia técnica que no es muy común. Permite personalizar una amplia gama de capacidades en función del objetivo, ofrece a sus controladores un marco de gran alcance para la vigilancia de masas y se ha empleado en operaciones de espionaje contra organizaciones gubernamentales, operadores de infraestructura, empresas, investigadores y personas privadas.

Es probable que su desarrollo tomara meses, si no es que años, para ser completado y sus autores han hecho todo lo posible para cubrir sus pistas. Sus capacidades y el nivel de recursos detrás de Regin, indican que es una de las principales herramientas de ciberespionaje utilizadas por un Estado-Nación.

Como se indica en un nuevo informe de Symantec[DOB1] , Backdoor.Regin [DOB2]  es una amenaza de múltiples etapas y cada una está oculta y cifrada, con la excepción de la primera, en la que se inicia una cadena dominó de descifrado y se carga cada etapa posterior, dando un total de cinco etapas. Cada etapa individual proporciona poca información sobre el paquete completo. Sólo mediante la adquisición de las cinco etapas es posible analizar y comprender la amenaza.

fig1-architecture.png

Figura 1. Las 5 etapas de Regin

Regin también utiliza un enfoque modular, lo que permite que se carguen o incluyan características personalizadas adaptadas al objetivo. Este enfoque modular se ha visto en otras familias de malware sofisticado tales como Flamer y Weevil (La Máscara), mientras que la arquitectura de carga multi-etapa es similar a la observada en la familia de amenazas Duqu/Stuxnet.

 

Línea de tiempo y perfil del objetivo

Las infecciones Regin se han observado en una variedad de organizaciones, entre 2008 y 2011, tras lo cual, se retiró abruptamente. Una nueva versión del malware resurgió a partir de 2013. Los objetivos incluyen empresas privadas, entidades gubernamentales e institutos de investigación. Mientras que casi la mitad de todas las infecciones se produjeron en direcciones que pertenecen a los proveedores de servicios de internet (ISPs), los objetivos de estas infecciones eran miembros de esas empresas. Del mismo modo, los ataques a empresas de telecomunicaciones parecen estar diseñados para tener acceso a las llamadas que se enrutan a través de su infraestructura.

fig2-sectors.png

Figura 2. Infecciones confirmadas de Regin por sector

Las infecciones son también geográficamente diversas, habiendo sido identificadas en diez países diferentes.

fig3-countries.png

Figura 3. Infecciones confirmadas de Regin por país

 

Vector de la infección y cargas útiles

El vector de la infección varía entre objetivos y ningún vector reproducible se ha encontrado al momento de la escritura. Symantec cree que algunos objetivos pueden ocultados para visitar versiones falsas de sitios web conocidos y la amenaza puede ser instalada a través del navegador web o mediante la explotación de una aplicación. En una computadora, los archivos de registro mostraron que Regin se originó de Yahoo! Instant Messenger, a través de una secuencia de mandos sin confirmar.

Regin utiliza un enfoque modular, lo que da flexibilidad a los operadores de estas amenazas, ya que pueden cargar características personalizadas adaptadas a cada objetivo individual cuando sea necesario. Algunas cargas útiles personalizadas son muy avanzadas y exhiben un alto grado de conocimientos en sectores especializados, una prueba más del alto grado de recursos de los que disponen los autores de Regin.

Hay docenas de cargas útiles Regin. Las capacidades estándar de la amenaza incluyen varias características de acceso remoto troyano (RAT) tales como: captura de pantalla, control de las funciones del mouse, robo de contraseñas, monitoreo del tráfico de la red y la recuperación de archivos borrados.

Más específicos y avanzados módulos de carga útil también fueron descubiertos, tal es el caso de un monitoreo del tráfico del servidor web Microsoft IIS y un rastreador de tráfico de la administración del control de estaciones base de telefonía móvil.

 

Precauciones

Los desarrolladores de Regin ponen un considerable esfuerzo para hacerlo altamente discreto. Su carácter discreto significa que potencialmente puede ser utilizado en las campañas de espionaje que duran varios años. Incluso, cuando se detecta su presencia, es muy difícil determinar lo que está haciendo. Symantec sólo fue capaz de analizar las cargas útiles después de descifrar archivos ejemplo.

Tiene varias características “de precaución”. Éstas incluyen capacidades anti-forenses, un sistema virtual hecho a la medida de encriptado de archivos (EVFS) y cifrado alterno en la forma de una variante de RC5, que no se usa comúnmente. Regin utiliza múltiples sofisticados medios para comunicarse secretamente con el atacante, incluso a través de ICMP/ping, la incrustación de comandos en las cookies de HTTP, TCP personalizado y protocolos UDP.

 

Conclusiones

Regin es una amenaza altamente compleja que se ha utilizado en recolección sistemática de datos o campañas de recopilación de inteligencia. El desarrollo y el funcionamiento de este malware han requerido una importante inversión de tiempo y recursos, lo que indica que detrás es probable que esté un Estado/Nación. Su diseño hace que sea muy adecuado para las operaciones de vigilancia persistentes y de largo plazo contra objetivos.

El descubrimiento de Regin destaca las grandes inversiones que se siguen haciendo en el desarrollo de herramientas para su uso en la recopilación de inteligencia. Symantec cree que muchos de los componentes de Regin permanecen sin ser descubiertos y pueden existir funciones y versiones adicionales. Un análisis adicional continúa y Symantec publicará cualquier actualización de futuros descubrimientos.
 

Otras lecturas

Indicadores para los administradores de seguridad e información técnica y detallada sobre Regin se puede encontrar en nuestro whitepaper – Regin: Top-tier espionage tool enables stealthy surveillance

 

Información de protección

Symantec detecta esta amenaza como Backdoor.Regin[DOB4] .

 

POS malware: Potent threat remains for retailers

The retail industry continues to be a low-hanging fruit for attackers and attacks are likely to continue until the full transition to more secure payment technologies.

Twitter Card Style: 

summary

As Americans gear up for another holiday shopping season, the threat posed by point-of-sale malware remains high. More than a year after the discovery of the first major attacks against POS networks, many US retailers are still vulnerable to this type of attack and are likely to remain so until the complete transition to more secure payment card technologies in 2015. 

While some retailers have enhanced security by implementing encryption on their POS terminals, others have not and retailers will continue to be a low-hanging fruit for some time. While the introduction of new technologies will help stem the flow of attacks, it will not eliminate fraud completely and attackers have a track record of adapting their methods. 

Point-of-sale malware is now one of the biggest sources of stolen payment cards for cybercriminals. Although it hit the headlines over the past year, the POS malware threat has been slowly germinating since 2005 and the retail industry missed several warning signals in the intervening period. This allowed attackers to hone their methods and paved the way for the mega-breaches of 2013 and 2014, which compromised approximately 100 million payment cards and potentially affected up to one-in-three people in the US.

Attacks have reached epidemic proportions in part because POS malware kits are now widely available, which means attackers can target retailers without having to develop their tools from scratch. For example, BlackPOS (detected by Symantec as Infostealer.Reedum), which was used in the some of the most high profile attacks, has been for sale since February 2013 with a price tag of US$2,000. This is a relatively small investment for attackers, who are likely to net millions from a successful operation. 

pos-barchart-662x518.png
Figure 1. Point-of-sale attacks exploded once malware kits became widely available on the cyberunderground

Hopelessly exposed
Attacks on point-of-sale terminals had their genesis as far back as 2005, when attackers began using networking-sniffing malware to intercept payment card data while in transit. A group of attackers led by Albert Gonzalez were the main perpetrators, stealing more than 90 million card records from retailers. 

As payments processors and retailers tightened up their security, the attackers adapted and attention turned to the point-of-sale terminal. When a card is swiped, its details are briefly stored in the terminal’s memory while being transmitted to the payment processor. This provides a brief window for malware on the terminal to copy the card data, which it then transmits back to the attackers. The technique is known as “memory scraping”. 

POS malware was first discovered October 2008, when Visa issued an alert on a new type of exploit. During a fraud investigation, it found that attackers had been installing debugging software on POS systems that was capable of extracting full magnetic stripe data from its memory. Little heed appears to have been taken of this warning, giving malware developers time to perfect their methods. In the intervening period, developers have worked to streamline the malware, integrating all functionality into a single piece of software. 

This development process eventually led to fully featured POS malware kits emerging on underground markets from 2012 onwards. US retailers were hopelessly exposed and what followed was a flood of high profile breaches, with several major US retailers hit by POS malware attacks. 

Spotlight: BlackPOS
One of the most widely used forms of POS malware is BlackPOS which is also known as KAPTOXA, Memory Monitor, Dump Memory Grabber, and Reedum. Variants of BlackPOS have been used to mount some of the biggest retail POS breaches. 

Its development mirrors the evolution of the broader POS malware market. The earliest versions of BlackPOS date from 2010. Over time, it has evolved into a highly capable cybercrime tool which employs encryption to cover its tracks and can be customized to suit the target environment. 

By February 2013, BlackPOS was ready for the mass market and the group behind one of its variants began selling it on underground forums, charging customers $2,000 for the package. 

Thriving marketplace
While the malware used to mount POS attacks is usually sold on underground forums, these forums are also often where the bounty of those attacks returns to be sold. For example, stolen credit card details from some of the biggest US breaches were sold on a forum known as Rescator. 

New research from Symantec found that prices can vary heavily depending on a number of factors, such as the type of card and its level, i.e. gold, platinum or business. Card data originating from the US tends to be cheaper because of the widespread availability stolen US cards. Card details along with extra information, known as “Fullz”, tend to attract higher prices because details such as someone’s date of birth or credit card security password make it easier to perform fraudulent transactions or other activities. 

Single credit cards from the US tend to cost $1.50 to $5, with discounts often available for those who buy in bulk. Single cards from the EU tend to cost more, selling for $5 to $8. Fullz start at $5 and can range up to $20. A single embossed plastic card with custom number and name meanwhile will sell for approximately $70. The stolen cards uploaded to Rescator were initially selling at a cost of $45 to $130 per card before prices later settled down.

Will new technologies render POS malware obsolete? 
New payment card technologies, many of which are already in use in Europe, have been promoted as effective countermeasures for POS malware but are not a silver bullet. Their arrival is likely to herald the end of the large-scale POS breaches seen in recent years, but they will not eradicate theft of credit card data completely.  

The adoption of EMV, chip-and-pin cards to replace traditional magnetic stripe cards ought to render the current generation of memory-scraping POS malware ineffective. However, chip-and-pin cards are still susceptible to skimming attacks and stolen credit card numbers can still be used in “card-not-present” transactions, such as online purchases. 

Additionally, stolen credit card information in Europe is often used in the US since it doesn’t have chip and pin as a verification method. Going by this precedent, the advent of chip and pin in the US may mean attackers will continue to attempt to steal card information but use it in other countries that don’t use the chip-and-pin standard. 

The chip-and-pin standard itself may be superseded at some point by the adoption of NFC mobile payment solutions such as Apple Pay, Google Wallet or CurrentC. With these payment technologies, the credit card number isn’t transmitted during the transaction. NFC is still susceptible to exploitation by attackers, but most attacks require physical proximity, making large-scale thefts almost impossible.

Advice for consumers
Some retailers are rolling out encryption on their point-of-sale networks to prevent memory scanning, which is encouraging. However, attackers have a tendency to adapt and evolve, and will no doubt look to circumvent these additional countermeasures. 

There are several steps you can take to remain vigilant against this type of fraud:

  • Monitor your bank account and credit card statements for any strange or unfamiliar transactions. Notify your bank immediately if you notice anything suspicious. Small transactions, such as a $1 charitable donation, are often used by criminals to test if a card is still usable.
  • Carefully guard personal information such as your address, your Social Security number, or date of birth, and don’t use easily guessed passwords or PIN codes. All of these details can be used to facilitate identity theft and defeat additional security checks.

Advice for businesses
Symantec has a number of solutions for retailers who wish to guard their point-of-sale systems from attack. For more details, please read: Secure Your Point-of-Sale System

Symantec protection
Symantec products detect all of the currently known variants of point-of-sale malware, including:

BlackPOS

FrameworkPOS

Dexter

Chewbacca

JackPOS

RawPOS

Vskimmer

Backoff

Further information
For more information about attacks against POS systems, please read our whitepaper entitled: Attacks on point of sales systems

Spin.com visitors served malware instead of music

Compromised site sent visitors to Rig exploit kit to infect them with a range of malware including Infostealer.Dyranges and Trojan.Zbot.

Toolbox_concept.png

On October 27, while tracking exploit kits (EKs) and infected domains, Symantec discovered that the popular music news and reviews website spin.com was redirecting visitors to the Rig exploit kit. This exploit kit was discovered earlier this year and is known to be the successor of another once popular EK, Redkit. The Rig EK takes advantage of vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer, Java, Adobe Flash, and Silverlight and was also one of the EKs associated with the askmen.com compromise back in June.

At the time of writing, the spin.com website was no longer compromised. However, spin.com is a popular site in the US, according to Alexa, so the attackers could have potentially infected a substantial amount of users’ computers with malware during the time the site was compromised. The number of potential victims could grow substantially depending on the length of time the website was redirecting visitors to the EK prior to our discovery. Our data shows that the attack campaign mainly affected spin.com visitors located in the US.

Fig1.png
Figure 1. Symantec telemetry shows visitors based in the US were most affected by spin.com compromise

How the attack worked
The attackers injected an iframe into the spin.com website, which redirected users to the highly obfuscated landing page of the Rig EK.

Fig2_13.png
Figure 2. Injected iframe on compromised spin.com website

When the user arrives on the landing page, the Rig EK checks the user’s computer for driver files associated with particular security software products. To avoid detection, the EK avoids dropping any exploits if the security software driver files are present.

Fig3_0.PNG
Figure 3. Rig EK searches for driver files used by security software products

The EK then looks for particular installed plugins and will attempt to exploit them accordingly. In the recent compromise, the Rig EK took advantage of the following vulnerabilities:

Upon successfully exploiting any of these vulnerabilities, a XOR-encrypted payload is downloaded onto the user’s computer. The Rig EK may then drop a range of malicious payloads such as downloaders and information stealers including banking Trojan Infostealer.Dyranges, and the infamous Trojan.Zbot (Zeus).

Symantec protection
Symantec has detections in place to protect against the Rig EK and the vulnerabilities exploited by it, so customers with updated intrusion prevention and antivirus signatures were protected against this attack. Users should also ensure that they update their software regularly to prevent attackers from exploiting known vulnerabilities. Symantec provides the following comprehensive protection to help users stay protected against the Rig EK and the malware delivered by it in this recent website compromise:

Intrusion prevention

Antivirus

Pony stealer spread vicious malware using email campaign

Most people want to stay on top of their bills, and not pay them late. But recently, unexpected emails claiming an overdue invoice have been showing up in people’s inboxes, causing anxiety and ultimately a malware attack. Read this report from the Avast Virus Lab, so as a consumer you’ll know what to look for, […]

Pony stealer spread vicious malware using email campaign

Most people want to stay on top of their bills, and not pay them late. But recently, unexpected emails claiming an overdue invoice have been showing up in people’s inboxes, causing anxiety and ultimately a malware attack. Read this report from the Avast Virus Lab, so as a consumer you’ll know what to look for, […]

Avast! Mobile Security gets award from AV Comparatives

AV Comparatives awarded avast! Mobile Security for its malware protection and highly developed theft-protection. Most people would not dream of neglecting the security of their PCs or laptop, but those same folks forget that the device in their pocket is just as powerful, if not more so. You’ve heard it before –your expensive smartphone, which […]

Bad news for SMBs: Target’s “Backoff” malware attack hits 1,000 more businesses

U.S. merchants advised to protect themselves against same PoS hack that hit Target and Neiman Marcus last year. More than 1,000 U.S. businesses have had their systems infected by Backoff, a point-of-sale (PoS) malware that was linked to the remote-access attacks against Target, Michaels, and P.F. Chang’s last year and more recently, UPS and Dairy […]

Reveton ransomware has dangerously evolved

      No Comments on Reveton ransomware has dangerously evolved

The old ransomware business model is no longer enough for malware authors. New additions have made Reveton into a truly dangerous business. The latest generation of Reveton, the infamous “police” lock screen/ransomware, targets new black market business. The authors upped the ante of the despised malware from a LockScreen-only version to a dangerously powerful password […]